Patterns
Findings that only appear when you look at all 100 entries at once.
Standing rule: no scores. Color marks whether something is in force, reversed, contested, concluded, or permanent, not good or bad.
- Color is a legal fact, not an opinion. It shows (whether something is still in force, was reversed, or is contested in court), never whether it was good or bad.
- Click a figure that has an entry to see the documents and how strongly the number can be tied to the action (). A few macro counts (gross debt, this-term jobs, this-term judges) have no matching entry, so they stay unlinked rather than pointed at the wrong document.
- Nothing here is scored, graded, or ranked. When two credible sources disagree, this archive shows both numbers instead of picking one.
- Wins are in here too. See or filter the Ledger by .
- Nobody is asking you to trust a byline. There isn’t one — the archive is anonymous, on purpose, which is exactly why it has to be checkable without one. See and check one entry against its own source yourself.
What survives, by period
Second-term actions are reversed at a visibly higher rate. But they are also younger, and litigation takes time. Read this as a snapshot of current standing, not a verdict on durability.
How strong is the archive’s own evidence
level across every effect claim in the archive. A tracker whose claims were overwhelmingly Direct would be either extraordinary or dishonest. Most real-world effects are contributory at best.
What stops things
Of the 15 entries currently blocked or voided, courts did most of the stopping. That is a finding about the system, not about any administration, and it applies symmetrically to the next one.
Domain by standing
Every entry, cross-tabulated. Darker means more entries in that cell. Blank means none, including the blanks that show where this archive still needs coverage.