The source labeled New York State Unified Court System case record linked to the civil eCourts homepage, a portal for civil cases, not the criminal indictment.

A source labeled CDC ACIP charter and membership record linked to cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/. The AAP v. Kennedy source linked to the CourtListener docket index rather than the stay order.

A source labeled National Taxpayer Advocate annual reports linked to taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov/reports/, an index of every year's report.

VA announcements linked to va.gov/opa/pressrel/. Congressional hearing records linked to congress.gov/committees, a list of every committee.

A source labeled FCC docket records linked to fcc.gov/ecfs/, the search page for every FCC filing.

A source labeled OECD comparative excess mortality linked to oecd.org/health/.

A source labeled FEMA budget and staffing documents linked to fema.gov/about/reports-and-data.

The source labeled Congressional Record, joint session January 6-7, 2021 linked to congress.gov's Congressional Record browse hub, with a note that no single URL identified the sitting.

Two sources labeled as mediation reporting and State Department statements linked to cfr.org and state.gov homepages.

A source labeled as Space Force organization and budget documents linked to spaceforce.mil's homepage.

The War Powers report linked to congress.gov's homepage, with a note that the document is classified. DoD casualty reporting linked to defense.gov's homepage.

The 354-60 House disapproval linked to clerk.house.gov/Votes, a list of every House vote. OCHA situation reports linked to unocha.org's homepage.

The source labeled Phang v. Blanche, No. 1:26-cv-01417 linked to govinfo.gov's entire U.S. Courts collection, with a note that no single URL on that system identified the case.

The source labeled as the Supreme Court opinion linked to Lisa Cook's Wikipedia page. The contested field still said this was a live case, even though status already recorded the June 29, 2026 holding that the removal was unconstitutional.

A source labeled "District court orders on Guard deployments" linked to govinfo.gov's entire U.S. Courts collection.

Harvard College v. HHS linked to govinfo.gov's entire U.S. Courts collection.

Perkins Coie LLP v. DOJ linked to govinfo.gov's entire U.S. Courts collection.

A source labeled "Court order vacating the 2024 rule" linked to govinfo.gov's entire U.S. Courts collection.

A source labeled "Docket and subsequent dismissal record" linked to govinfo.gov's entire U.S. Courts collection.

A source labeled "Post-ruling class certification dockets" linked to govinfo.gov's entire U.S. Courts collection. No single docket was named.

Storch v. Hegseth linked to govinfo.gov's entire U.S. Courts collection.

Associated Press v. Budowich linked to govinfo.gov's entire U.S. Courts collection.

A source labeled as Revolution Wind v. Burgum linked to BOEM's project page, with a note that the court rulings lived elsewhere.

A source labeled as the SDNY indictment in United States v. Maduro Moros linked to the U.S. Attorney's Office homepage.

A source labeled as GAO's Market Facilitation Program review linked to GAO's reports-and-testimonies collection, after an earlier report ID 404'd.

A source labeled as the June 1, 2026 D.C. Circuit ruling in Talbott linked to the Wikipedia page for Executive Order 14183.

A source labeled as Kevin Warsh's confirmation timeline linked to his Wikipedia page.

The first two clickable sources were NPR's National Guard deployments series and Capital B's Guard city tracker. The entry is about interior ICE enforcement, custody deaths, and named shootings. Neither URL supported those claims. The 91% border-apprehension figure named CBP but linked only FactCheck. The 33 custody deaths named ICE but linked a detention-management page, not death reporting. The El Paso homicide ruling named the medical examiner with no URL.

The Eastman disbarment cited UPI and CNN. Barr's December 2020 no-outcome-determinative-fraud statement and Georgia's risk-limiting audit were named in estimates with no URL.

The source labeled "EDVA docket and dismissal opinion" linked to govinfo.gov's entire U.S. Courts collection, with a provenance note admitting no single URL on that system identified the cases.

One estimate slot held both "$4.1 trillion including interest" and "$4.7 trillion through 2035 on a dynamic basis," sourced to two CBO publications at once. The 10 million uninsured figure was sourced only as "CBO" with no publication number, while the deficit scores already named 61570 and 61466.

statusDetail named Dobbs, Bruen, Loper Bright, and Trump v. United States as decisions of the resulting majority, but the clickable sources list had only Dobbs and the Federal Judicial Center database.

Overview, staples, and vs-presidents showed 54 second-term confirmations as 9 appellate and 45 district as of July 2026. The judges entry's own statusDetail already said 287 Article III judges across both terms, which is 234 + 53, so the tile contradicted the entry it sat next to.

An estimate said dynamic feedback offset "roughly 20% of the static cost," sourced only as "JCT macroeconomic analysis." JCX-69-17 says the conference agreement's conventional $1,456 billion revenue loss is reduced by $451 billion of growth feedback (about 31 percent), with $66 billion of extra debt service netting that to $385 billion (about 26 percent). Twenty percent is not in that paper.

An estimate dated Proclamation 10989 to November 10, 2025. The proclamation is dated November 7, 2025 ("this seventh day of November"). November 10 was the news cycle. It was published in the Federal Register on November 14.

statusDetail, the apprehension estimate, Overview/now-state/staples/dossiers/vs-presidents, and Commonly Misread all still carried FactCheck.org's April 2026 vintage (85,218 apprehensions, a 92% decline) while the entry's asOf was already August 2026. The estimate named "CBP data via FactCheck.org" and a Pew FY2025 encounter analysis, but neither document was in the entry's clickable sources list.

The entry's estimates cited the August 6, 2026 GAO audit (GAO-26-108615) in four places and a Lancet USAID-mortality paper in one, but the clickable sources list had only BLS and the founding executive order. The Dossiers beat and a Milestones row still used the pre-sweep blended wording ("nearly 2,000" contracts / "nearly $35 billion") that the entry itself had already replaced with GAO's two distinct figures ($27.4 billion / 2,503 contracts, and $37.0 billion / 3,910). Federal civilian employment was still quoted as 352,000 / 11.7% from FactCheck's April vintage; the July vintage is 324,000 / 10.8% through June 2026, consistent with rehiring after the freeze ended.

Estimates quoted Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (2026) and "up to $175 billion in refunds" from the Penn Wharton Budget Model, but the clickable sources list was CRS, the Section 122 statute, and a Holland & Knight writeup. A reader opening the entry could not open the opinion or the model that supplied the headline $175B figure.

Overview, now-state, staples, and vs-presidents still showed +369,000 jobs (January 2025–March 2026) and a 14-month comparison from FactCheck.org's April update, while the archive's asOf was August 2026. The Claims view's 30,573 tally named the Washington Post Fact Checker as its source but the tile was not a link to that article; the whole card routed to Methodology.

statusDetail described the sentence only as "An unconditional discharge imposes no imprisonment, fine, or probation but leaves the conviction in place," without Judge Merchan's own stated reason for structuring it that way. Read on its own, the line can land as "the crime didn't really matter," which is not what the record supports. Merchan said the opposite.

Ten Corrections entries (dated 2026-08-14 and 2026-08-15) described the findings behind them as coming from an "independent fairness review," "independent readability review," or "a reviewer built specifically to distrust euphemism and false balance", while the Masthead's own "Review record" section states plainly, describing the same underlying passes: "These passes were run by the author against the author's own work... This is not independent review." A reader who opened Corrections without first reading that Masthead disclaimer would reasonably take "independent" at face value, which contradicts what the archive says about itself two clicks away.

The "withheld-new-entrant-278" row (the archive's own "most careful page, on purpose") rested on a single source: a June 2025 letter from Sen. Adam Schiff, a Democratic critic of the administration, labeled "Tier 2" even though this archive's own glossary defines Tier 2 as peer-reviewed research or a nonpartisan institution, and its own precedent (a bipartisan Khanna/Massie legislator letter elsewhere in the archive) classifies a lawmaker's letter as advocacy, not Tier 2. That made this the one row on the archive's most sensitive page thinner than the sourcing bar the rest of the site holds itself to. checkEntry()'s advocacy-not-alone rule requires a Tier 3 source never stand alone, but financialTies.json sits outside checkEntry()'s coverage entirely, since it only walks entries.json.

The "Southern border apprehensions fell sharply" claim already carried three estimates (the 85,218/92%-decline figure via FactCheck.org, the administration's own framing of it as its central achievement, and a negative-finding estimate on the absence of a causal-attribution study). A fairness review flagged that this claim reads thinner than the same entry's enforcement-cost claims (majority non-criminal arrests, four deadly task-force shootings with two named victims, sustained protest), which run longer and carry more specific detail. That review's premise that this claim was "a single bare statistic beside a one-line DHS quote" was itself inaccurate (it already had three sourced estimates) but the underlying observation, that the claim lacked absolute/comparative magnitude next to a headline percentage, held.

The summary read "A US-brokered framework produced a ceasefire in Gaza and the release of remaining living hostages, after two years of war." That was stated as flat archive fact, with none of the hedge this same entry already carries two fields down: its own "contested" field states "Credit for a mediated agreement is inherently shared among mediators and parties. This entry records the US role as decisive per analysts, not as sole cause," and its own effect estimate attributes the identical claim to a source ("US pressure on both parties is widely credited by regional analysts as decisive in reaching the framework"). The summary is the first and most-read text on the entry and asserted the stronger, unattributed version of a claim the entry's own body explicitly disclaims, a matter of characterization (credit-sharing among multiple mediators, Qatar, Egypt and Turkey, and both parties to the war), not settled fact. `checkEntry()`'s CAUSAL check only scans `effect.claim`, so nothing mechanical catches an inconsistency between an entry's summary and its own body.

The Financial Ties view documented Trump's own holdings and the Trump-family crypto/federal-crypto-policy overlap, but carried nothing on Elon Musk (named in the DOGE entry as its public face) despite SpaceX and Tesla holding federal contract and regulatory relationships with agencies (FAA, NHTSA) that DOGE's government-wide reach touched.

The fake-elector effect claim ("Certificates from fake electors were submitted in seven contested states") documented the scheme as established fact (the House Select Committee's report, Eastman's upheld disbarment, and state grand jury indictments) but carried no estimate stating the electors' own defense theory, that the slates were 'contingent,' meant to preserve litigation options pending court challenges. Every other comparably contested entry in this archive (DACA, sanctuary jurisdictions, DEI, the transgender military ban, Title X) pairs a disputed finding with the accused party's own characterization as a labeled estimate; this was the one exception.

The "Standing indicators" strip on Overview had no figure for Cabinet-level appointments or turnover, despite tracking judges seated, border enforcement, and other personnel-adjacent figures.

The "Controls below the WCAG AA/AAA target-size minimum" row read "Not yet re-measured against the built app". No longer true. It had in fact been measured twice: a desktop pass (0 violations, CI-enforced) and a separate manual mobile pass at 390px (also 0 violations), neither reflected in the copy.

Indicators' and Markets' term-comparison tables, and Personnel's yea/nay vote bars, colored figures using the site's actual `--color-cost`/`--color-benefit` tokens purely by arithmetic sign or vote direction, a falling unemployment rate or a `nay` vote rendered in the same red used elsewhere for net-cost incidence, silently contradicting "color marks standing only, not good or bad" on pages that state that exact rule. Separately, the shared "New here?" onboarding banner's dismiss button landed at the bottom-left of the card instead of pinned near the heading whenever its text wrapped on a narrow screen (a flex-wrap/justify-between interaction), and every view's specific explanatory subtitle was deleted from the DOM entirely on mobile (`hidden md:block`). Dossiers' inline source labels (e.g. "GAO report, August 6, 2026") were plain, non-interactive text, contradicting that page's own banner claim that every number links to its source.

The `ice`, `edu`, and `s232` promise rows showed only the linked entry's short `status` field. Each entry's own effects data documents a fact that complicates or contradicts the promise's own wording: the majority of surged-area arrests being non-criminal-conviction (ice), halved staffing with documented civil-rights and aid-servicing backlogs (edu), and a net manufacturing-job loss from the tariffs meant to bring jobs back (s232). None of it reached the Promises page. The page also gave no account of why some promises read "Kept" and most read "In progress," and native vs. linked promises were distinguishable only by a subtle date-format difference.

The archive had no scale-ranked view of its own entries and tracked only 4 campaign promises (wall, aca, nowars, ukraine24), all sourced entirely from within their own entries. 96 entries total.

The `futureact` entry's contested field joined two independent clauses with a semicolon into one long sentence. The `unemploy2019` entry's contested field referenced "the Tier 1/2 literature cited here", the archive's own internal source-tier shorthand, used inline in prose with no glossary link and no other instance of it anywhere in the 96 entries' free-text fields.

The presidential comparison table covered debt added, debt per year, net jobs, and judges confirmed, four axes, none of them a measure of executive power itself.

Every entry's "contested ground" disclaimer (the field recording what's genuinely unresolved, including where the archive itself could be wrong) rendered after all of that entry's claims and estimates, for all 92 entries that carry one.

Four separate stat displays (the new elapsed-term comparison (caught pre-publish), the "Trump II so far" cards on the vs.-Presidents page, the "Standing indicators" ticker at the top of the Overview view, and "Where the presidency stands right now" just beneath it) colored figures red or green by whether the number read as favorable or unfavorable to the administration. A drop in border apprehensions was colored green and captioned "the administration's central claimed achievement" in two of the four; debt, job losses, and a falling approval number were colored red in the rest. All of this sat on pages whose own banner states "no scores... color marks standing only, not good or bad."

The Overview view's 23 headline tiles rendered in whichever order they had been appended to `headline.json` over time, which front-loaded costs (the first four tiles were cost, mixed, cost, cost) with both benefit-tagged tiles not appearing until well past the halfway point.

Of the page's three substantive sections ("favours him," "cuts against him," "nobody is right yet"), only "favours him" carried a colored border, a colored heading, and a working link to the sourced entries in the Ledger. The color used was STAND.ACTIVE (the "in force" legal-standing token) repurposed to mark this one section as the favorable one, with no equivalent path to verify the other two.

Two claim headings used narrative framing not matched elsewhere in the entry: "An organized effort submitted certificates from fake electors in seven contested states," and "The campaign pressured Vice President Pence to reject or delay certification of the electoral count." A third heading, "Legal consequences for the events themselves," was vague relative to its own sourced content (the Senate acquittal and Trump v. Anderson).

A completed roadmap item read "Accessibility: WCAG AA contrast, 44px targets, skip link, main landmark, drawer focus management."

Status read that tariffs "terminated February 24, 2026," and refund exposure was given as a single figure, "near $166 billion," sourced to "trade-law practitioner analyses."

151 distinct source-lean labels, including pure synonyms ("Academic" / "Peer-reviewed academic" / "Academic / peer-reviewed"), and British and American spellings mixed roughly evenly across 36 instances.

Status read "Partially implemented; multiple actions litigated," and the savings-claim effect cited press verification of documentation errors.

Stated that Section 232 tariffs "were struck down alongside the IEEPA tariffs in February 2026."

Effect claim "Federal deficits increase relative to prior law" was labeled Contributory.

Status detail said "roughly 450 miles were built."

Status read "In effect; under Supreme Court review."

Cited CBO’s 13-million projection without noting CBO’s later revision.

40 of 215 source URLs pointed at a publisher's homepage rather than the document the source's own label named. "Trump v. CASA, Inc. (2025)" resolved to supremecourt.gov; "Navigable Waters Protection Rule, Federal Register" resolved to federalregister.gov.

The entry's executive-order source was deep-linked to Executive Order 14151 (Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing). The entry states four times (in its summary, its action, its status detail, and a Direct-attribution effect claim sourced to "Executive order text") that Executive Order 11246 was revoked. EO 14151 does not mention EO 11246, revocation, or affirmative action anywhere in its text.

The source labelled "American Hospital Association v. Azar, D.C. Circuit (2020)" linked to https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/, the court's homepage. A reader clicking to verify that the rule survived challenge landed on a front page. It was left that way on the recorded finding that the D.C. Circuit publishes opinions under unguessable GUID paths and that the govinfo USCOURTS package IDs do not resolve.

Six source urls point at a publisher's site rather than at the document their label names, because each label names a plural or open-ended body of material, or in one case a document that is not public. The reasons were recorded in an internal document. On the site itself the links were indistinguishable from a citation that had simply gone stale.

The Flaaen & Pierce Federal Reserve source pointed at a URL ending "…2018-2019-tariffs.htm", which returns a Federal Reserve "Page not Found". The stored address was a truncation of the real one, the paper's slug continues "…-on-a-globally-connected-us-manufacturing-sector".

The PIIE Phase One tracker source pointed at /research/piie-charts/chinas-purchases-us-goods-under-phase-one-trade-agreement, which returns PIIE's "Page Not Found". PIIE reorganised its chart URLs under a year segment at some point after the citation was written.

The source labelled "FDA COVID-19 vaccine authorization record" pointed at an fda.gov page that returns "Page Not Found". FDA reorganised the section and did not redirect: their own current COVID-19 landing page still links to a "COVID-19 Vaccines" node that 404s as well, so there is no live successor to follow.

The entry stated that presidential-family crypto ventures had drawn ethics scrutiny, sourced to a single estimate whose source field read only "Government ethics organizations". No group named, no dollar figure anywhere in the entry despite one being disclosed and publicly reported.

The entry covered the certification delay, the impeachment and acquittal, and the dismissed federal case, but its effects never mentioned the fake-elector scheme or the pressure campaign on Vice President Pence, the documented conduct at the center of the House Select Committee's findings and the DOJ indictment.

The Disputed "Legality under domestic and international law" claim paired the administration's own position (a DOJ opinion it has declined to release, which does not itself assert legality) against a named Democratic legislator, Rep. Jim Himes, calling the operation "clearly illegal." No independent or right-leaning legal-scholar defense of the Article II / 2002 Iraq AUMF theory was cited, even though this archive cites exactly that kind of counterweight elsewhere on comparable questions, Justice Alito's dissent on the National Guard entry, and "minority scholarship... cited by the administration" on the birthright-citizenship entry.

Every entry drawer's "Cite this entry" block built its permalink from `SITE_ORIGIN` in `src/lib/citation.ts`, which still read `https://the-record-taupe.vercel.app` after `thetrackrecord.org` became the live, canonical domain. A reader citing any entry got a URL on an abandoned Vercel subdomain instead of the real address, directly beside the drawer's own sentence promising "this entry has a stable address and will not be silently rewritten," the one claim on the page specifically about citation durability.

The entry said Trump v. CASA (June 2025) left the underlying Fourteenth Amendment question undecided, and that the question remained open — accurate when written, but the entry was never updated after a later ruling.

status/statusDetail described a ceasefire in effect since April 8, 2026, "neither concluded nor formally resumed." The nuclear-program effect claimed no public, independently verified damage assessment existed.

contested and two effect estimates stated that no public determination of the messages' classification status existed.

contested and one effect estimate stated the administration's DOJ legal opinion had been declined for public release.

summary and action stated the promises were made in the order tips, then overtime pay, then Social Security.

status/statusDetail said the archive recorded no final merits ruling on whether a President may remove a Fed governor at will.

statusDetail claimed rates rose "again in 2022-23 despite public pressure" with no source for that specific episode. The entry made no mention of Powell's chairmanship ending or the DOJ investigation into him.

One estimate said "ICE's own account described medical distress in segregation" regarding the January 3, 2026 death of Geraldo Lunas Campos.

status/statusDetail asserted litigation over the 2025 withholding was ongoing.

statusDetail described only the Supreme Court's emergency-posture order permitting enforcement, with no mention of any subsequent appellate ruling.

statusDetail said later-phase provisions "have not been implemented" with no mention of any intervening developments.

statusDetail (and the same line duplicated in now-state.json) listed negotiating rounds in "Abu Dhabi, Miami."

status called the subsidy question "unresolved" while statusDetail, in the same entry, already said the subsidies "were not extended" (past tense). The GAO source URL returned a real 404.

The affected-positions estimate said the range was "tens of thousands to over 50,000," with no mention of an actual implemented figure.

The Hague Summit Declaration source linked to NATO's general official-texts index rather than the declaration itself. statusDetail did not mention Spain's carve-out from the 5% target.

A CREW article from February 2025 (last updated April 2025) was cited as the source for a January 2026 bank-charter application it could not have mentioned.

An estimate said 2018-2019 farm payments ($23B) exceeded the auto industry bailout in nominal terms. The GAO source URL 404'd. statusDetail asserted further aid was authorized in 2025 without citing a source for it.

A 2024 House Oversight Committee report was labeled "majority-party staff."

This entry independently repeated the venezuela entry's already-corrected "DOJ opinion kept classified" claim and the iranwar entry's already-corrected "ceasefire since April 8, violated" framing. summary said the two operations began "in the first six weeks of 2026" (Jan 3 to Feb 28 is eight weeks).

The entry's "234 judges" figure was correctly scoped to the first term, but the entry made no mention that confirmations continued into the second term.

statusDetail attributed PATTERN criticism to "the DOJ's own review committee."

action said "formal UN notification August 2017; effective November 4, 2020" — internally inconsistent, since a one-year notice period from August 2017 would land around August 2018, not November 2020. A Contextual-attribution claim used "driven substantially by," sharing the root of the rule-banned "drove."

Cited the SUPPORT Act's House vote as 393-8. Cited the overdose-death peak as "above 111,000 in 2022."

status/statusDetail said the individual provisions, set to expire after 2025, were "extended by" OBBBA — implying a future sunset still exists.

An estimate attributed "roughly 1,000 jobs added... against an estimated 75,000 fewer jobs" directly to a named Federal Reserve working paper.

status said reunification litigation "concluded 2023." The HHS OIG source URL 404'd.

status/statusDetail described the 2026 joint review as "scheduled," implying it had not yet occurred.

status/statusDetail said "regional expansion stalled."

An estimate about lost flu-surveillance access cited a source ("CDC and public health association statements") that does not appear anywhere in the entry's own sources array and could not be independently confirmed. contested did not mention WHO's own public dispute over the withdrawal's validity.

status said "collection ceased February 22, 2026." A related entry (tariffrevenue) independently found a possible Feb 24 date elsewhere and left it unresolved.

An estimate cited "approximately 80 miles" of net-new wall mileage to a GAO source. statusDetail described only first-term construction, with no mention of continued second-term building.

A CBO citation (cbo.gov/publication/56964) was used to support a claim about CBO revising its mandate-repeal coverage model. statusDetail said California v. Texas (2021) "upheld" the ACA.

An estimate said "roughly 48-50% of 317 catalogued objectives" per the crowdsourced tracker. Another estimate said the President "publicly referenced Vought's Project 2025 role approvingly in a 2025 post," citing "Truth Social posts, 2024 and 2025" with no actual post in the sources array.

One effect claim (Direct attribution) said troops "remained active in DC, Memphis and Los Angeles" — directly contradicting this same entry's own statusDetail two fields up, which correctly says the Guard was withdrawn from Los Angeles.

statusDetail described the November 2025 dismissals with no mention of any subsequent challenge to them.

action said "IEEPA collection ceased February 22, 2026" — the announcement date, not the actual cessation date.

statusDetail and contested both described the underlying birthright-citizenship constitutional question as still entirely open, four months after this archive's own birthright-citizenship entry recorded that it was resolved.

statusDetail described "the February 2026 termination of the IEEPA tariffs" as removing part of the price pressure, with no mention that they were replaced.

The uscode.house.gov citation for 42 U.S.C. § 265 rendered a "Document not Found" page — missing required query parameters.

An estimate said the Court "expressly declined to consider campaign statements as evidence of purpose." statusDetail described the 2025 proclamation with no mention of subsequent litigation.

The only CBO source cited (cbo.gov/publication/61486) is CBO's dynamic estimate of the House-passed bill before enactment — its figures don't match the $3.4T/$4.1T/$4.7T/$5.5T cited next to it. action described the vote as simple party-line reconciliation.

An estimate said "more than half — nearly $35 billion — was either not terminated or could not be corroborated... Nearly 2,000 of 13,476 contracts."

The entry referred to Todd Blanche only as "Deputy Attorney General" throughout, with no mention that Pam Bondi was fired or that Blanche became Attorney General. statusDetail said only "a federal judge ordered... The dispute is unresolved," without naming the case, judge, or its escalation.

status/statusDetail said "vaccines remain authorized and licensed" with no mention of any subsequent change.

The CARES Act citation linked to S.3548, which shows "Introduced" only on congress.gov and never became law.

statusDetail mentioned only the pending state appellate appeal.

An estimate said "both chambers passed war-powers resolutions... the President vetoed them" (plural).

An estimate said "PCE inflation near 4.5%."

An estimate said "prior HHS Inspector General reviews had found ACIP's conflict-of-interest processes broadly functional," citing a 2009 OIG report. status said "In force" with no mention of any court action.

The CBO citation (publication 61486) supporting Medicaid coverage-loss estimates is a whole-bill dynamic deficit score with no Medicaid breakdown at all.

statusDetail ended at West Virginia v. EPA (2022) and said "neither rule now governs" — implying a regulatory vacuum since 2022.

status/statusDetail said "little activity... no commercial production has occurred" with no mention of any 2025-26 sale. One estimate said "major oil companies largely declined to bid" and cited "$1 billion in revenue" to "BLM sale results."

statusDetail described one stop-work order, reversed by a court, with no mention of anything after that.

status said "Superseded, but its narrow reading largely prevailed," ending the story at the 2023 post-Sackett rule.

An estimate said the 2025 CRA resolution "eliminated the statutory methane fee." status said "standards under renewed rescission."

An estimate said "CBO projected roughly 3.8 million more uninsured over a decade" (read as a one-time total). action described extension efforts as simply having failed.

statusDetail described the effort only abstractly as "voluntary manufacturer agreements," with no mention of a named program.

An estimate cited "CEQ and GAO timeline data" for a four-year EIS completion figure.

The GAO citation linked to a generic CRA topic-hub page with no opinion text.

Every uscode.house.gov citation using the req=granuleid: URL form (11 entries: iranwar, prosecutions, blsfiring, chevron2, natlguard, universities, fema, igfirings, impoundment, tariffrevenue, signal) rendered a "Document not Found" page — the site requires additional query parameters to resolve the granule that the original URLs omitted.

statusDetail described current recipients as being in "indefinite limbo" with no mention of active enforcement risk. A figure conflated the active-recipient peak with the cumulative-ever-approved total.

statusDetail said "The Senate voted 68-23 to oppose the withdrawal" and status said "Partial withdrawal; forces later repositioned," describing a residual US presence.

statusDetail said the Sixth Circuit vacated the 2024 restoration "applying the major questions doctrine."

The title and summary promise "clemency for political allies, campaign donors and convicted fraudsters," but the entry body covered only the January 2025 J6 pardons.

status said the joint venture was "announced" and statusDetail described it as still being negotiated.

statusDetail described the law as static with no mention of any 2025-26 developments.

status said "Enjoined and vacated" with no mention of any appeal.

The citation pointed at 29 U.S.C. § 2 (the Bureau's general statistics duty), not the Commissioner appointment/tenure provision. statusDetail said nothing about who has held the role since.

action described the April 9, 2025 sunset-provisions directive as a "memorandum" and cited no source for either April 9 action.

The CBO citation (publication 59720) supporting claims about the 2025 IRS enforcement clawback is actually a Nov. 2023 letter scoring an unrelated $14.3B rescission tied to a 2024 Israel-aid supplemental.

statusDetail implied Washington, LA, Chicago and Portland all had ongoing deployments.

statusDetail said "No Supreme Court ruling has resolved the question" with no mention of a real stay favoring the administration. A citation said Train v. City of New York "rejected" the administration's Article II argument.

statusDetail said a court "ordered access restored; compliance has been partial" — framing it as a compliance shortfall against a standing order.

statusDetail described transfers of function as "announced and litigated" with no mention of how the central RIF litigation actually resolved.

An estimate said the replacement AI order "relies on voluntary commitments and sector-specific agency authority." status said state preemption simply "failed."

status said "Struck down — every order litigated was invalidated" and contested called the outcome "four for four against the government," with no mention of any appeal.

statusDetail said prices remained "near record levels."

statusDetail said "Portions remain in litigation" with no mention of a follow-on order or its status.

An estimate said FEMA "lost roughly a third of permanent staff."

An estimate said the November 2025 grant pardoned 77 people "involved in" the fake-electors plot, and grouped them under a claim label calling the whole set "people convicted of fraud."