The figures that matter most, each traceable to one entry and one named source.
Standing rule: no scores. Color marks whether something is in force, reversed, contested, concluded, or permanent, not good or bad.
Unscored · 97 entries · last change 2026-08-16
New here? Read this first (30 seconds)
Color is a legal fact, not an opinion. It shows (whether something is still in force, was reversed, or is contested in court), never whether it was good or bad.
Every number links to its source and to how strongly it can be tied to the action (). Click any figure to see the full evidence.
Nothing here is scored, graded, or ranked. When two credible sources disagree, this archive shows both numbers instead of picking one.
Wins are in here too. See or filter the Ledger by .
Nobody is asking you to trust a byline. There isn’t one — the archive is anonymous, on purpose, which is exactly why it has to be checkable without one. See and check one entry against its own source yourself.
Public approval37% approve · 57% disapproveNet approval of roughly −21 is the lowest of either term, below his post-January-6 floor of −19. Independent approval near 34%.Polling averages, early August 2026
Next scheduled testMidterm elections, November 2026Three months out. Independent approval below the level that preceded the 2018 wave; the entire House and a third of the Senate are on the ballot.Election calendar
Figures of record
▲ and ▼ are direction. Color is measured : who paid, who gained, not whether that was right. Click a figure that has an entry. Not every figure here is a cost. Filter to just .
▲$2.8T
added to the national debt so far this term
18 months in; the JEC reported $2.77T year-over-year in April 2026
Net cost
Added since January 2025 — from $36.22T to roughly $39T. Borne by future taxpayers through debt service; sources put the range at $2.2T–$2.8T depending on cut-off.
Gross national debt · Treasury / Federal Reserve
▲54
more federal judges confirmed this term
On top of 234 in the first term
Transfer
9 appellate, 45 district. Ahead of the 2018 confirmation pace but with a far thinner pipeline — 60 nominees submitted against 137 by this date in 2018.
Lifetime judgeships filled this term · Senate confirmation record
▲369K
total jobs added, Jan 2025 – Mar 2026
vs. 1,565,000 in the final 14 months prior
Transfer
Positive but roughly a quarter the pace of the preceding 14 months. Private sector +609K, offset by federal cuts.
Total nonfarm employment · BLS via FactCheck.org
What this archive is made of
97 entries, 203 effect claims, 520 sourced estimates, 230 linked documents. Zero scores, grades, or rankings.
Where every entry stands today
Color here is a legal and operational fact, not an opinion: whether the action is still in force, was reversed or never fulfilled, is contested in court, has concluded, or is irreversible.
Coverage by domain
Bar segments show the standing mix inside each domain. Click any row to open it in the ledger.
The honesty check on the whole archive. If nearly everything claimed Direct, the archive would be overreaching. Amber marks claims where credible sources reach incompatible conclusions.
Direct138
Contributory28
Contextual20
Disputed17
What the evidence is made of
Every estimate in the archive, grouped by the kind of institution that produced it. Advocacy sources are admissible but never appear alone.
Primary document157
Government data79
Party to the action67
Academic / peer-reviewed52
Nonpartisan scorekeeper41
Advocacy — labeled31
Journalistic verification26
Named / interested parties24
Archive reasoning — not a source17
Cross-ideological convergence13
Mixed / other11
Polling aggregate2
The disagreement, charted
These are the numbers people argue with. Each bar is one published estimate at its own value, never averaged into a single figure, because the width of the gap is itself the finding.
10-year deficit effect — OBBBA
$ trillions, 2025–2034
CBO, excl. interest3.4
CBO, incl. interest4.1
CBO, dynamic (thru 2035)4.7
CRFB, if made permanent5.5
10-year deficit effect — TCJA
$ trillions
JCT, dynamic1.07
JCT, conventional1.46
CBO, incl. interest1.9
Project 2025 implementation — competing trackers
% of that tracker’s own agenda list
CPR / GFI — 532 proposals, method published53
Crowdsourced tracker — 317 objectives, no method48
Employment effect — steel & aluminum tariffs
jobs
Steel production jobs added1000
Steel-consuming mfg. jobs lost-75000
2017-06-01 · Energy & environment · initiative
Withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement
6 of 97
Layer 1 — Action
Rose Garden announcement June 1, 2017; formal UN notification August 2017; effective November 4, 2020. Executive order re-initiating withdrawal signed January 20, 2025.
Announced US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement in 2017; withdrawal took effect November 4, 2020, was reversed in 2021, and was initiated again on January 20, 2025.
Layer 2 —
Withdrawn again — effective January 2026
The 2025 executive order triggered a one-year notice period under Article 28. The United States is again outside the agreement, while remaining a party to the underlying UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Verified as of August 2026
Advocates on both sides attribute emissions trends to policy; the measurable driver in the period was fuel-price-driven substitution in electricity generation.
Layer 3 — Measured effects
US greenhouse gas emissions continued a decline that began before 2017, driven substantially by coal-to-gas substitution and state-level policy.
US energy-related CO2 emissions fell in most years 2017-2024, with the largest single drop in 2020 (pandemic).
EIA Monthly Energy Review
Government statistical agency
Federal withdrawal had limited near-term emissions effect because Paris commitments were non-binding.
Rhodium Group
Independent research institute
Withdrawal reduced US influence over other countries’ commitments — an effect that is real but not directly measurable.
Council on Foreign Relations analysis
Nonpartisan, internationalist orientation
The agreement itself imposed no enforceable emissions requirement on the United States.
Paris commitments are nationally determined and legally non-binding as to targets.
Text of the Paris Agreement, Articles 3-4
Primary document
Withdrawal therefore carried no direct legal consequence for US emissions; the effect is diplomatic rather than regulatory.